My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LUBA Materials Volume 3 of 3
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
LUBA Materials Volume 3 of 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:35 PM
Creation date
7/21/2015 11:17:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
LUBA Materials
Document_Date
1/20/2014
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
485
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TAYLOR Becky G <br />om: Rachel Stedman <dazzleshine@icloud.com> <br />sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:36 PM <br />To: TAYLOR Becky G <br />Subject: Regarding the Oakleigh Meadows Tentative Planned Unit <br />Hi Becky, <br />Will you please post this letter below to public record. <br />Thank you, <br />Rachel Stedman <br />October 2, 2013 <br />Eugene Hearing Official <br />Eugene Planning and Development <br />Atrium Building <br />99 West 10th Ave. <br />Eugene OR 97401 <br />le: Citizen Comment Document Regarding the Oakleigh Meadows Tentative Planned Unit Development (PDT 13-0001), <br />,Ilamette Greenway Permit (WG 13-0001) <br />Dear Hearing Official, <br />I object to the proposed PUP for the reasons stated in the Comments of Lauren Regan and Bryn Thorns, and all <br />additional objections incorporated by reference into that Comment. I am also a member of the River Road Community <br />Organization and submit my comment on behalf of the RRCO as well. <br />I have a few development questions that I asked the property owners, Joan Connelly and David Adee from the very <br />beginning of their project development. I went with my family to their first meeting held in the meadow when they told <br />us that their development was low impact of 8 to 10 single attached dwellings with shared kitchen/common house . <br />They said that it would not be like condos. They bragged about helping save Razor Park a few blocks away along the <br />bike path. They told me that it was important to keep the meadow mostly natural. All of what they have said has now <br />change into a major development using every square footage of the meadow. <br />My questions were never answered and I stopped asking after the February meeting this year at the River. Road Annex. <br />It was disappointing for me to see pictures of their new vision. Their supporters were mostly single older people, not all <br />ages, no children, like they first talked about. They basically told me this is how they have to build it because of cost <br />issues. <br />I own and live in the third house from the dead end of Oakleigh Lane. The Condo project will be built in front of my <br />house. These are my unanswered personal questions and concerns that will directly impact my home: <br />We like our country charm.of our Oakleigh Lane. Oakleigh residents need to know right now if the street will need side <br />elks. Who will be paying for this? If each resident is responsible, what-is the cost? Why does OMC want their <br />:ighbors to go into debt for their building greed? <br />1149 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.