transportation should be provided by the.applicant from the development site and to River Road. <br />The required right of way in this case should be required of the applicant for the entire stretch of <br />Oakleigh Lane as this is the true transportation impact that the development will have on <br />adjacent and nearby areas. <br />One hundred percent of existing local residents voiced opposition to this development <br />proposal so I was very disappointed to hear that the City approved of it: Those of us who are to <br />be directly impacted by this proposed development have very real concerns, and none more <br />significant than safety. The HO's decision and staff report leave many essential questions <br />unanswered in regards to this issue. By failing to fully investigate the traffic impacts with the <br />required Traffic Impact Analysis or ensuring the safety to all by requiring the right of way to <br />include all of Oakleigh Ln, assumptions are being made in regards to traffic safety. The <br />consequences to poor planning in this case would prove to be detrimental to all involved. I urge <br />the planning commission to take a hard look at this issue and reject the development as proposed <br />due to, among the many other issues, insufficient traffic safety measures. <br />298 - <br />