health of the cedar trees to the north. If so, no.landscaping shall be required. <br />Condition of Approval #13 (as modified/replaced): <br />• The final PUD plans shall show the applicant's proposal for "espaliered" trees along the outside <br />face of the proposed concrete wall as a requirement. The required landscaping shall be the <br />responsibility of the owner(s) and maintained as a requirement of the PUD approval. Those <br />portions of the wall adjacent to unenclosed parking areas shall also be limited to 6 feet in <br />height. Plans shall also be revised to show a minimum 5-foot setback for the wall along the <br />west and south boundaries of the site. A reduced setback may be allowed for Building 6, so <br />long as the applicant obtains the necessary maintenance access easement from the adjoining <br />owner, in compliance with EC 9.2751(7), and all other conditions of approval are met. <br />Condition of Approval #15 as modified/replaced): <br />• The final PUD plans shall show landscaping along the southern property boundary except along <br />the length of the proposed wall (see related Condition #13) and the easternmost property line <br />segment (123.48 feet) where existing trees are shown on the applicant's plans. The required <br />landscaping shall meet the High Screen Landscape Standard (L-3) at EC 9.6210(3). Additional <br />landscape screening is not required along the eastern property boundary. <br />Accordingly, PUD approval is hereby affirmed. The foregoing findings and conclusions are adopted as <br />the Final Order of the Eugene Planning Commission for Oakleigh Meadows Co-Housing PUD (PDT 13-1) <br />this I (atL day of December, 2013. <br />William Randall, Chair <br />Eugene Planning Commission <br />Attachment A: December 11, 2013 City Attorney Memo from Anne Davies <br />Attachment B: Hearings Official's Decision, dated November 12, 2013 <br />Final Order: Oakleigh Meadows Co-Housing PUD <br />Page 12 <br />17 <br />