Attachment B <br />o On-site Pedestrian Circulation: provided between buildings and shared facilities, <br />. consistent with EC 9.6730; <br />o Recycling and Garbage Areas: not located in the front yard setback and has <br />perimeter screening, consistent with EC 9.6740. <br />Based on the above findings, the development complies with the applicable multiple-family <br />development standards at EC 9.5500. With regard to EC 9.6105 Bicycle Parking Space <br />Standards, the development appears to exceed these requirements, subject to stall dimensions <br />and security details being determined during the building permit process. EC 9.6105 requires <br />one long-term bicycle parking space per dwelling unit. With 28 units plus the common house, <br />29 long-term bicycle parking spaces are required. Short-term bicycle parking is not required of <br />residential development. <br />The applicant indicates that 52 spaces are proposed; the plans show four sheds scattered <br />across the site and a "bike barn" near the southeast property corner. The plans do not provide <br />enough specificity to determine whether the long-term space security requirements are met, <br />but those can be addressed in greater detail during the building permit process. The PUD plans <br />show ample room on the development site to accommodate the required bicycle parking. <br />Additional bicycle parking (more than the 29 long-term spaces required) does not have to meet <br />code standards, with regard to dimensions and security specifications. Based on these findings, <br />the bicycle parking space standards of EC 9.6105 will be met. <br />Hearing Official Conclusions <br />The Hearings official is not aware of opposition arguments directed at this criterion. The <br />neighbors did testify generally that the size, height and number of buildings was simply too <br />large for the neighborhood. Those concerns are discussed in the findings for EC 9.8320(12), and <br />13). <br />Staff Findings <br />With regard to EC 9.6410 Motor Vehicle Parking Standards, the applicant's plans show 16 <br />covered spaces, as garages and carports along the west property line. The applicant's plans <br />note that there are 31 additional open/surface parking spaces. The plans show approximately <br />29 gravel parking spaces abutting the paved driveway. The minimum number of vehicle parking <br />spaces required is one per dwelling unit (or 29 in this case). It appears that the minimum <br />requirement is met; there is no limitation on the maximum number of vehicle parking spaces <br />for residential development. The actual number of spaces is difficult to determine because the <br />applicant does not propose to stripe the spaces in accordance with the stall dimension <br />standards of EC 9.6410; however, the scaled plans show sufficient areas to accommodate the <br />required parking. Public Works staff notes that, due to the 22-foot wide drive aisle, all of the <br />parking spaces are considered compact. <br />Hearings Official Decision (PDT 13-1, WG 13-1) 48 <br />