My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Application Completeness Review
>
OnTrack
>
Z
>
2015
>
Z 15-5
>
Application Completeness Review
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2015 4:00:27 PM
Creation date
7/13/2015 9:07:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
Z
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
5
Application Name
LAUREL RIDGE
Document Type
Application Completeness Review
Document_Date
6/26/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Methodology/North Arrow - Exhibit F states that the 30th Avenue, the UGB and the <br />Diagram's north arrow "...were referred to by staff as 'Referents."' Staff does not recall <br />advising the applicant to rely on the north arrow or how, nor does the Hearings Official or <br />LUBA appear to use it in his analysis of the prior case. Please further explain how the <br />applicant has used the north arrow as a referent, and how the correct mapping orientation <br />(i.e. true north) is maintained through the process of overlaying the Metro Plan diagram <br />with surveyed data (e.g. 30th Avenue, the UGB, and the subject tax lots). <br />4. Transportation Planning Rule - Please address the existence (or lack thereof) of the Parks <br />and Open Space (POS) comprehensive plan designation at the time the TSP was adopted, <br />and how this relates to the requested TPR exemption. <br />Previous Site Analysis Map - A map similar to the current plan sheet ZC-4 (Diagram on <br />Subject Prop.) was included as Attachment B in the 2012 Hearings Official packet for the <br />Laurel Ridge PUD. This graphic, labeled as sheet SA7.0 and named "Site Analysis: Land Use <br />and Infrastructure," depicts a larger area of Parks and Open Space (POS) zoning on the <br />subject property than is currently proposed. <br />Please describe why this map differs from the current sheet ZC-4. If this discrepancy <br />relates directly to a difference in the methodology used to define the POS boundary, <br />please explain the method (i.e. referents) used to generate the 2012 version as compared <br />to the current request. <br />6. On page 6 of the submitted narrative, please note that the correct Metro Plan Diagram <br />Ordinance No. is "20319." <br />If you have any questions about this completeness review, please contact me at (541) 682-5437 or <br />via e-mail at: erik.bergPci.eugene.or.us <br />Sincerely, <br />Erik Berg-Johansen <br />Assistant Planner <br />Enclosures: Land Use Application - Completeness Review Step; <br />Incomplete Land Use Application -180 Day Completeness Review Process <br />CC: Environ-Metal Properties, LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.