My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ATT New Evidence Submitted During First Open Record Period
>
OnTrack
>
CU
>
2014
>
CU 14-3
>
ATT New Evidence Submitted During First Open Record Period
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2015 4:11:17 PM
Creation date
6/18/2015 10:30:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CU
File Year
14
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
ATT AT CROSSFIRE
Document Type
Public Comments submitted after hearings official hearing
Document_Date
6/17/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
measured at the property line to_45dBa. The applicant submitted an updated acoustical report from <br />SSA Acoustics, LLP dated March 21, 2011. This report was subsequently reviewed by Environalysis LLC <br />on behalf of the City of Eugene. The review confirmed that the noise at the property line was less than <br />45 dBA as required. No special conditions need to be applied to mitigate noise. Given that the <br />application meets the telecommunications noise standards will have minimal impact related to noise <br />consistent with this criterion. <br />Glare - No tower lighting is proposed.. Security lighting will be required to meet. outdoor lighting <br />requirements at EC 9.6725, which require cutoff and shielding as necessary to direct light within the <br />boundary of the development site. Given these standards, glare from the lights will be adequately <br />mitigated. <br />Electromagnetic Radiation (NIER) emissions -Telecommunications standards at EC 9.5750 require the <br />applicant to submit documentation demonstrating compliance with non-ionizing electromagnetic <br />radiation (VIER) emissions standards as set forth by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). <br />The applicant provided a report as Exhibit 0, which includes the documentation demonstrating <br />compliance with non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation (NIER) emission standards as set forth by the <br />Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This report was subsequently reviewed by Environalysis <br />LLC on behalf of the City of Eugene as required at EC 9.5750(11). The review concluded that "The <br />information in the applicant's proposal is sufficient to determine that the noise and NIER impacts of <br />the project fall well within regulatory limits set by Federal and local jurisdictions. No special conditions <br />need to be applied to mitigate noise or NIER emissions." Given that the proposal meets these <br />requirements, there is no evidence there will be substantial off-site impact from NIER emissions. <br />Visual Impacts - The findings and conditions provided in the concurrent PUD (PDT 10-2) at EC <br />9.8320(3), (12) and (13) are incorporated herein by reference as demonstration that sufficient <br />screening will be provided to mitigate visual impacts on surrounding properties. <br />Based on the findings above, this criterion is met. <br />(c) If the proposal involves a residential use, the project is designed, sited and/or <br />adequately buffered to minimize off-site impacts which could adversely affect the <br />future residents of the subject property. <br />As the use is not residential, this criterion is not applicable. <br />EC 9.8090(3): The location, design, and related features of the proposal provides a <br />convenient and functional living, working, shopping or civic environment, and is as <br />attractive as the nature of the use and its location and setting warrant. <br />This criterion relates the nature of the use. In this case, the use is a telecommunications tower and <br />ancillary facilities. It does not provide a living, working, shopping or civic environment. The findings <br />and conditions provided in the concurrent PUD (PDT 10-2) at EC 9.8320(3), (12) and (13) are <br />incorporated herein by reference as demonstration that sufficient screening will be provided in <br />compliance with this criterion. <br />Staff Report <br />(PDT 10-2 & CU 11-1) June 2011 33 <br />HO Agenda -Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.