My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ATT New Evidence Submitted During First Open Record Period
>
OnTrack
>
CU
>
2014
>
CU 14-3
>
ATT New Evidence Submitted During First Open Record Period
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2015 4:11:17 PM
Creation date
6/18/2015 10:30:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CU
File Year
14
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
ATT AT CROSSFIRE
Document Type
Public Comments submitted after hearings official hearing
Document_Date
6/17/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
the Eugene Country Club golf course just to the south, Lane Memorial Gardens on West 11th and Rest <br />Haven Memorial cemetery which include buildings and structures to support the use, while being <br />zoned R-1 with an open space designation: <br />To the extent that the applicant's findings are relevant and provide context and general support for <br />findings of consistency with the Metro Plan, they are also incorporated here by reference (applicant's <br />written statement, pages 2-4). <br />Based on the available information, there are no policies or other provisions in the Metro Plan that <br />conflict with the proposed PUD. The proposed development is consistent with the above criterion. <br />EC 9.8320(2) The PUD is consistent with applicable adopted refinement plan policies. <br />The Willakenzie Area Plan_ WAP serves as the applicable adopted refinement plan for the area included <br />in this tentative PUD proposal. The property is located within the Cal Young subarea and is designated <br />Parks and Open Space on the Land Use Diagram in the refinement plan. The following General Policies of <br />the WAP appear to apply to this request: <br />Retain existing. sign ificant vegetation whenever possible to provide buffering between <br />residential and nonresidential uses (General Policy 3): <br />The proposed development does not propose removal of significant vegetation. The applicant proposes <br />new landscaping to be placed around the perimeter of the enclosure which will include 3 Red-Oaks and 25 <br />Emerald Arborvitae. All of the existing trees will be retained under the proposed project; some turf grass <br />will be relocated due to the rerouting of the golf cart path. Conditions of approval are included below at <br />EC 9.8320(4) to ensure that all trees are preserved. As such, the proposal is consistent with this policy. <br />Minimize land use conflicts by promoting compatibility between residential and nonresidential <br />land uses (General Policy 6): <br />The applicant's written statement refers to several elements that promote compatibility. These include <br />the use of a monopole instead of a lattice tower, tree preservation and new planting, and the tower is to <br />have a matte, non-glare finish and there will be no tower lighting. The discussion and findings at EC <br />9.8320(3) and (13) are also incorporated herein by reference. <br />This policy could also be read to provide direction to the City to promote compatibility. The PUD process <br />and criteria which are required through the overlay and telecommunications standards minimize land use <br />conflicts by requiring compliance with criteria that address compatibility, consistent with this policy. <br />The applicant addresses additional portions of the WAP on pages 4-6 of the written statement. To the <br />extent that those additional findings and policies, which are incorporated herein by reference, are <br />relevant and applicable to this request, staff generally concurs and finds that the proposed development <br />is consistent with the WAP and the above criterion. <br />EC 9.8324(3) The PUD will provide adequate screening from surrounding properties including, <br />but not limited to, anticipated building locations, bulk, and height. <br />Staff Report <br />(PDT 10-2 & CU 11-1) June 2011 <br />Ho Agenda -Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.