further reduce noise levels and thereby ensure the applicable standard will be met, the Planning <br />Commission finds that it is "possible" to produce a noise study that will comply with the City's noise <br />standards in the future. While Mr. Noxon's testimony asserts there are issues with the existing study <br />provided, the Planning Commission finds that there is no reason to believe that the applicant would not be <br />able to address the issues Mr. Noxon raises during the future Final PUD process, if they are found to be <br />valid. The noise study will be substantively reviewed for compliance with the noise standard during a <br />future Final PUD process; conditions of approval could also be applied at that time to require any <br />mitigation needed to ensure compliance. <br />For the reasons set forth above, the Planning Commission affirms its prior approval on remand, with <br />additional findings of compliance concerning the noise standard at EC 9.5750(7)(f). <br />V. FINAL CONCLUSION <br />For the foregoing reasons, and based upon the identified evidence and argument in the record, the <br />Planning Commission finds that the Application satisfies the limited criteria at issue on remand. <br />Therefore, the Planning Commission denies the assignments of error, and affirms the Hearings <br />Official's conclusion to approve the Tentative Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit <br />(PDT 10-2 and CU 11-1), subject to the conditions identified in the Planning Commission's Final Order <br />dated October 4, 2011. <br />Randall S. Hledik, Chair Date <br />Eugene Planning Commission <br />Final Order-On Remand March 4, 2013 Page 8 <br />(PDT 10-2 & CU 11-1) <br />