plantings) after contact with a land owner, the applicant will only be required to provide the <br />following: <br />1) If the subject property is the Northgreen Apartments property, a minimum of 8 <br />evergreen or deciduous trees on the Oakway Golf Course planted within 20 feet of <br />the adjoining Northgreen Apartments property line. <br />2) A minimum of 2 evergreen or deciduous trees on the Oakway Golf Course planted <br />within 20 feet of each adjoining property line for all other. properties shown and <br />listed on Attachment A. <br />The final tree preservation/landscape plan (Sheet L-1) shall be certified by the landscape <br />architect as meeting these requirements and show the location and species of existing trees <br />and new screening vegetation to be planted on the development site and adjoining <br />properties (in accordance with land owner responses) and contain the following notes: <br />• New trees to be planted on the development site shall be a minimum caliper of 2" for <br />deciduous trees and a minimum height of 6-feet for coniferous or evergreen trees at <br />time of planting. <br />• The proposed trees shall be planted a minimum of ten feet from structures and must be <br />located outside any easements. <br />• The plantings must be inspected and approved prior to the City granting final approval <br />of the building permit. <br />• Watering and general maintenance of replacement trees, new vegetation, and other <br />screening on the subject property shall be conducted by the owner or lessee of the <br />subject property in a manner that ensures establishment and long-term survival. <br />Maintenance of any screening located on the adjoining properties shall be the <br />responsibility of the owners of those properties. <br />• The cost of the landscape architect and initial implementation of the screening plan <br />shall be the responsibility of the applicant. <br />Compliance with this condition of approval shall be demonstrated as part of the final PUD <br />approval process. <br />With these additional findings and imposition of the modified condition of approval, the Planning <br />Commission denies the appellant's sixth PUD assignment of error. <br />Northareen Property Seventh Assignment of Error <br />Neighborhood Applicant Meeting - EC 9:7007(2) Applicant Meeting Required for PUD <br />Application <br />The Hearings Official addresses this issue on pages 4 and 5 of his decision. The appellant asserts the . <br />Hearings Official failed to look at the plain language that required such a meeting. <br />The applicant submitted the initial application within the required 180 day timeframe but later added a <br />concurrent CUP application after the 180 day timeframe following the initial neighborhood/applicant <br />meeting. The Hearings Official correctly found that the intent of the meeting is to share information <br />and the proposal did not change from the time of the meeting to submittal of the CUP application. In <br />Final Order -AT&T Mobility <br />(PDT 10-2 & CU 11-1) October 4, 2011 Page 10 <br />