My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ATT New Evidence Submitted During First Open Record Period
>
OnTrack
>
CU
>
2014
>
CU 14-3
>
ATT New Evidence Submitted During First Open Record Period
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2015 4:11:17 PM
Creation date
6/18/2015 10:30:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CU
File Year
14
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
ATT AT CROSSFIRE
Document Type
Public Comments submitted after hearings official hearing
Document_Date
6/17/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
APPEAL STATEMENT ~ , <br /> <br />~r ~ RE DECISION APPRO'~ING ZONE CHAN ~Q~ <br />1~ <br />~f. ~ LOOKING GLASS SCHOOL FILE ~ 11-3 ~ `{`y'~` ~ ~ <br /> <br />Q~~~ <br />The following statement by appellant, who is the representative of the Jefferson <br />Westside Neighbors ~JWN}, a City-chartered neighborhood association, lists the <br />specific issues on appeal and identifies wheze the Hearings Official's decision is <br />inconsistent with the criteria applicable to the above captioned application for <br />approval of a zone change. <br />The jWN neighborhood association encompasses the subject property, and the <br />J~VN Executive Board voted unanimously to file this appeal. <br />PRELIMINARIES ~ ~ ~ <br />A, Settled issues <br />1. Policy 1 under the "Land Use Element" section of the 1987 <br />Wesfside Neighborhood Plan ~~1,'NP~ is a mandator a royal y Pp. <br />criterion. <br />Despite staff ignoring this policy in their original report and their <br />wavering on this issue at the public hearing, the Hearings Official <br />correctly found in favor of the J~IIN position presented in section <br />III.C of the Jv~N July 20, 2011 testimony: . <br />"~'he WIVP contains a general land use element policy applicable to <br />this application that provides: 'Prevent erosion o f the neighborhood's <br />residential character.' ~ f ind that f'oticy 1 Gunder the "iJand use <br />Element" sections and Chambers Policy z are both applicable criteria <br />for this zone change application," Decision at 4. <br />2. A zone change can be approved conditions, including a condition <br />that excludes certain uses permitted under the C-2 Community <br />Commercial Zone. <br />Despite staff's apparent position during the original decision that <br />the Hearings Official cannot approve a zone change with a <br />condition that limits future uses on the subject parcel to a subset of <br />those uses permitted by the requested zone, the Hearings Official ~ . <br />, <br />Appeal Statement Z 113 1 ~ August 16, 2011 <br />PC Agenda -Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.