My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ATT New Evidence Submitted During First Open Record Period
>
OnTrack
>
CU
>
2014
>
CU 14-3
>
ATT New Evidence Submitted During First Open Record Period
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2015 4:11:17 PM
Creation date
6/18/2015 10:30:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CU
File Year
14
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
ATT AT CROSSFIRE
Document Type
Public Comments submitted after hearings official hearing
Document_Date
6/17/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
City A~tarney's. ~ftice f . <br />• <br />Cify of Eugene _ 777 Pearl S~ree~, Raam '1 D5 <br />Eugene, Oregon 97~a1.2793 <br />. X54 ~ ~ 682-84A7 <br />X54 ~ ~ fi82-5~ ~ 4 FAX www.eu ene-ar. av . <br />September 21, X41 a <br />Bill loos <br />f,aw Dffice of BaII I~1oos PC ~ . <br />37S w nth Avenue, Suite ?0~ <br />Iaugene, OR 970 l ' <br />Dear Bill: ~ ~ ~ <br />. This responds to your public records request faa~ "any city documentlrecord that supports <br />or~ttstifies the appeal fee bung set at 50°/n of the application fee." . <br />Oregon public records law does not require that a. local gave~~.ment, ~ order to respond to a public records request, analyze whether a record "supports or justifies'' a local government <br />decision. Accordingly; the City is not providing. any' documents in response to your request fo~• <br />documents. that "su~port~ orjustify" the'' City's decision.' That said, in an effort tv provade~you <br />with documents rebated to the City's appeal fee being set at SQ°~~ of the application fee, the City <br />lool~ed for any report, study, worl~sheet or similar recazd compiled in I999 when .the City first <br />established the appeal fee at .SO°~a of the application fee. The City was unable to locate any such <br />document. <br />Please note that, pt~rsuant to DAR Z ~6M20Q~4a4a(~}, there is a three»year rete~ation period <br />for these types of documents. ~ 7n liglat of the fact that the City adopted the 50% appeal fee more <br />than eleven years ago, even though we are unable to locate any szlch documents today, it is <br />unknown whether any repoi~s, st~idies, worksheets or similar records existed when the City <br />adopted the appeal fee i~z 1999• <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /> <br />1{athryn P • Brotherton ~ . <br />Assistant City Attorney <br />aa~ ~~a 2aa-ao~a~~~}states. <br />Financial 1n71~ac~ Analysis 1'tecorcls. t'tecords dacume»t the financial a~7alysis of various city <br />practices. ~ Useful far planning future budget proposals, Records include repoi~s, studies, <br />~~~arl;shee~s; and similar rPcui'rls. Suhje~l a i~i~~~~ includN the iinpacl of Ciaecific b~~llot meaaure; <br />f~ropU$~1~, lv-i,i~crc~asc i~eri~~il fees, Sicf; Ie;~~~c~ use n17~ii~,~si,, nncl the c~it~~'S rel7lfi'rnslllia ~~+f.ll~t!l~~ris~us ~ ' <br />ulili~ies. (.Ililinii~~~~i» re#ei~~~in»: ~ yta,~5}, . <br />PC Agenda -Page 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.