My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ATT New Evidence Submitted During First Open Record Period
>
OnTrack
>
CU
>
2014
>
CU 14-3
>
ATT New Evidence Submitted During First Open Record Period
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2015 4:11:17 PM
Creation date
6/18/2015 10:30:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CU
File Year
14
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
ATT AT CROSSFIRE
Document Type
Public Comments submitted after hearings official hearing
Document_Date
6/17/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
reasons. The calibration of "bars" to actual signal strength is not consistent across <br />various equipment manufacturers, or even among different handsets produced by the <br />same manufacturer. To demonstrate this, I placed an HTC phone on a desk next to an <br />Apple Phone. (Both were on the AT&T system). At this common location, the HTC <br />phone indicated 5 bars, the Apple showed 3 bars. In addition, there is no mechanism <br />available which would allow a casual user to determine which technologies and/or <br />frequency bands were being measured. In other words, Mr. Collinge's data doesn't and <br />can't tell us if he was measuring the 3G UMTS signal or the 4G LTE signal. Moreover, it <br />does not identify the origin of the signal(s) he observed. This is significant because one <br />of the older facilities currently providing some service to this coverage area will be <br />removed from service in the near future to address interference problems. Mr. Collinge <br />may well have been measuring the signal from this soon to be retired facility. <br />Lack of sufficient data points <br />Looking at the number of bars on a cell phone taken at a dozen points within a proposed <br />coverage area of several square miles provides insufficient data on which to form any <br />conclusion regarding coverage. An actual drive test, as conducted within the industry, <br />employs an automated, calibrated receiver capable of taking multiple field strength <br />readings per second, on multiple frequencies. Each of these readings is tagged with <br />location data from a GPS receiver to facilitate post processing and mapping. This <br />receiver is in operation in a vehicle as it drives (hence the term "drive test") as much of <br />the area under study as possible. At a minimum, all major and secondary roads within <br />the study are would be driven. Even a simple drive test covering a relatively small area <br />will result in literally thousands of data points. AT&T's practice is to conduct a drive test <br />Declaration of Thomas Gorton 2 <br />CU 14-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.