Metadata
JANISCH Amy C <br />Subject:FW: AT&T cell site at CrossFire <br /> <br />From: NYSTROM Steven A <br />Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 10:36 AM <br />To: BRECKENRIDGE Jaime <br />Cc: FLOCK Gabriel; GIOELLO Nick R <br />Subject: RE: AT&T cell site at CrossFire <br /> <br />Thanks Jamie. Nick, feel free to include in this first round of record extensions. Steve <br /> <br />From: BRECKENRIDGE Jaime [mailto:Jaime.Breckenridge@eweb.org] <br />Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 9:55 AM <br />To: NYSTROM Steven A <br />Subject: RE: AT&T cell site at CrossFire <br /> <br />Hi Steve, <br /> <br />I’m sorry I am just now replying to this email. I’ve been transparent with AT&T during this whole process as well and have no <br />concerns with submitting the email below in the record. Thank you for checking. <br /> <br />Jaime <br /> <br />From: NYSTROM Steven A [mailto:Steven.A.Nystrom@ci.eugene.or.us] <br />Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:13 AM <br />To: BRECKENRIDGE Jaime <br />Cc: FLOCK Gabriel <br />Subject: FW: AT&T cell site at CrossFire <br /> <br />Jamie, thanks for the email yesterday. Long night at the hearing, but I wanted to let you know that the record was left open <br />(which means new testimony can still be submitted). We’re considering submitting your email below, especially given that it <br />doesn’t match what AT&T was saying last night. Any concerns with that? Steve <br /> <br />From: FLOCK Gabriel <br />Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 9:23 AM <br />To: GIOELLO Nick R; NYSTROM Steven A <br />Subject: RE: AT&T cell site at CrossFire <br /> <br />Is this something we want in the record? <br /> <br />From: GIOELLO Nick R <br />Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:46 PM <br />To: FLOCK Gabriel <br />Subject: FW: AT&T cell site at CrossFire <br /> <br />FYI <br /> <br />From: BRECKENRIDGE Jaime [mailto:Jaime.Breckenridge@eweb.org] <br />Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:44 PM <br />To: GIOELLO Nick R; NYSTROM Steven A <br />1 <br />