My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments: Hearing Ex. 1 - ATT Additional Testimony (5/27/15)
>
OnTrack
>
CU
>
2014
>
CU 14-3
>
Public Comments: Hearing Ex. 1 - ATT Additional Testimony (5/27/15)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2015 4:05:57 PM
Creation date
5/28/2015 9:45:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CU
File Year
14
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
ATT AT CROSSFIRE
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
5/27/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Our team of engineers works on a plan to design sites to meet demand and high demand could mean more <br />than one new site is required. If two adjacent sites trigger a capacity site, the new site must be built <br />between them. Other sites are needed to improve coverage quality both indoors and outdoors. Some sites are <br />needed to expand the coverage footprint where coverage had not previously existed. <br />The New Site Target Locations are passed to the construction team to find suitable locations. <br />Collocation with existing facilities is considered and pursued wherever feasible. Placement on suitable <br />existing structures (building rooftops, sides of buildings, cupolas, utility poles and other existing structures) is <br />preferred if the existing structure meets the network design objectives and is feasible. <br />Once a site is secured, the Approval/Permit process begins. Rights-of-way or local zoning rules apply, <br />depending on the location. In addition, permitting review by other agencies at the local, state and federal <br />level may be required, for example: <br />• FAA <br />• FCC <br />• SHPO (State Historical Preservation Office) <br />• THPO (Tribal Historical Preservation Office) <br />Once all approvals are obtained, we begin building the site and commission it for service. <br />End-to-end cycle times vary greatly and are heavily influenced by the planning and permitting process of the <br />local jurisdiction. We aim to achieve approvals within timeframes set by the FCC Shot Clock. <br />A number of factors go into making the decision about where to place wireless antennas and infrastructure - <br />but AT&T is committed to working with the community. We're a part of this community, so we also want the best <br />possible placement while still delivering quality, reliable wireless service. <br />We listen to residents who are impacted by our proposed infrastructure. <br />Plow does strearnlining and expediting local ordinances positively affect siting? <br />Ensures access to reliable wireless communications services throughout the entire city more quickly; <br />Encourages the use of existing monopoles, towers, utility poles and other structures; <br />Minimizes duplicative processes and local jurisdiction staff resources; <br />Ensures public health, safety, welfare, and convenience. <br />More than likely. Through the Velocity IP (VIP) plan, AT&T is investing to significantly expand and enhance <br />the ability of our customers to access our wireless and wireline IP broadband networks across the country. <br />That deployment requires the cooperation of local jurisdictions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.