My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments: Hearing Ex. 2 - Friends of Amazon Creek Submittal
>
OnTrack
>
CU
>
2014
>
CU 14-3
>
Public Comments: Hearing Ex. 2 - Friends of Amazon Creek Submittal
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2015 9:28:58 AM
Creation date
5/28/2015 9:26:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CU
File Year
14
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
ATT AT CROSSFIRE
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
5/27/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City code requires the applicant comply with the 45 dBA standard, but state noise code <br />13 <br />(OAR 340-035-0035(1)(b)(B)) requires not more than + 10 dBA increase. The floor is <br />set at 31 dBA, as noted above, and the limitation according to the administrative rule is <br />therefore 41 dBA. <br /> <br />The applicant submitted equipment room. The <br />room (i.e., the <br />collocated equipment room), despite the fact that the equipment room will be legally <br />required to house equipment for an additional carrier. Because the applicant has not <br />satisfied the noise standards for one carrier, it goes without saying that the applicant will <br />not be able to satisfy the noise criteria for two carriers. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> manufacturer for <br />noise from AC units, resulting in underestimated noise predictions at neighboring <br />properties. <br />manufacturer. The other 6 data points were not included, which measure out t <br />underestimates the noise projected into the neighborhood. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />, given the above <br />underestimations. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />o explanation of noise control. <br /> <br />The applicant has not provided evidence to demonstrate that the acoustic louver and lined <br />hood provide 17 dB attenuation, which is typically done using octave analysis. <br /> <br />The applicant has not provided information sufficient to determine the noise level of the <br />generator at the air vents. This information would show the direct noise level and the <br />reverberant noise level, which should then be added together. <br /> <br />the property south of the subject property. The playground shed is the only building <br /> <br />13 <br /> OAR 340-035- <br />commercial noise source located on a previously unused industrial or commercial site shall cause <br />or permit the operation of that noise source if the noise levels generated or indirectly caused by <br />that nosei source increase the ambient statistical noise levels, L10 or L50, by more than 10 dBA <br />in any one hour, or exceed the levels specified in Table 8, as measured at an appropriate <br />measurement point, as specified in subsection (3)(b) of this rule, except as specified in <br />purposes, and the applicant is proposing a new industrial or commercial use in the form of a 75-ft <br />cellular tower. <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.