My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments: Hearing Ex. 2 - Friends of Amazon Creek Submittal
>
OnTrack
>
CU
>
2014
>
CU 14-3
>
Public Comments: Hearing Ex. 2 - Friends of Amazon Creek Submittal
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2015 9:28:58 AM
Creation date
5/28/2015 9:26:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CU
File Year
14
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
ATT AT CROSSFIRE
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
5/27/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ex. G <br /> <br />Crossfire Church Cell Tower Proposal <br /> <br />An Overview of my 4/20/15 Assessment of the SSA Noise Report <br />by Arthur Noxon, PE Acoustical Engineer, 5/26/2015 <br />1) Neighborhood mid-day background noise is reported by SSA to be 49 dBA, which suggests <br />this is a noisy neighborhood. I measured the background noise level at 2 am to be 31 dBA, <br />which suggests that at the noise sensitive time of the day the ambience is very quiet. <br />2) City code requires 45 dBA. State noise code OAR 340-35-035 (1,b,B) is the ambience + 10 <br />dB limit, now set at 31 + 10 = 41 dBA was not addressed by SSA. <br />nd <br />3) Noise model was for 1 equipment room. It did not include noise from the 2 equipment, the <br />collocated equipment room. AC fan noise in general is doubled, adding 3 dB to noise emitted <br />into the community, without considering any additional beaming effects such as building and <br />ground reflections. <br />This is easily <br />seen on Google Maps. <br />er. The other 6 data <br />neighborhood. <br />6) Noise model overestimates effect of ELNB hush kit according to mfg data.Rating is not <br />given as 6 dB but is given as . SSA chose to represent the attenuation factor as a <br />full 6 dB instead of a more conservative value. <br />7) In general, considering the above overestimations by SSA, their noise model overestimated <br />attenuation by 4.5 dBA. <br />8) Power generator <br />meter. This underestimated the sound power emitted by the generator by 1 dB. <br />9) No plans are provided in general for detailing noise control, <br />10) No proof is given that both acoustic louver and lined hood will provide 17 dB attenuation. <br />This is normally done using octave analysis. <br />11) No calculation is done to determine the noise level of the generator at the air vents. It would <br />show the direct noise level and the reverberant noise level and then add them together. <br />model.The playground shed is the only building south of the equipment rooms. It is too small <br />and too far away to reduce noise from multiple sources to the south by 10 dB. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.