My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments 5-15-15 to 5-25-15
>
OnTrack
>
CU
>
2014
>
CU 14-3
>
Public Comments 5-15-15 to 5-25-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2015 10:42:54 AM
Creation date
5/27/2015 9:50:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CU
File Year
14
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
ATT AT CROSSFIRE
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
5/27/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EC9.5750(7)(b)(5), and does not conflict with it, this section applies fully to the <br />current application. <br /> <br />The critical issue with this application is its location within an entirely residential <br />neighborhood. As such, the area is especially sensitive to the physical height of <br />the proposed tower. The maximum building height in the R-1 zone is 30 feet (per <br />Table 9.2750 Residential Zone Development Standards). Disguising a building by <br />painting it green or adding artificial branches to the outside of the building <br />would still not allow a building to be constructed beyond this height limit and <br />certainly not at 75 feet. <br /> <br />The applicant has failed demonstrate that a structure 75 feet in height is <br />compatible with residential neighborhood with a 30-foot height limitation. Efforts <br />by the applicant to disguise the tower as an artificial tree will not hide the <br />obvious fact that it is a transmission tower from surrounding property owners. A <br />tower of this scale is inherently incompatible with the immediately surrounding <br />residential neighborhood. In order for the mass and scale of the tower to be <br />reasonably compatible and have minimal impact, it would need to be contained <br />entirely within a structure that is dimensionally consistent with the zoning and <br />building codes for the R-1 zone. <br /> <br /> <br />(7) The proposal does not create any significant risk to public health and <br />safety, including but not limited to soil erosion and flood hazard, or an <br />impediment to emergency response. <br /> <br />While Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 states that personal <br />wireless service facilities may not be regulated on the basis of the environmental <br />effects of radio frequency emissions, this section of Eugene Code preserves <br />some consideration of significant public health and safety risks. <br /> <br />Due to the precarious location of this proposal, it places undue health and safety <br />risks on a very vulnerable segment of the population: elementary school children. <br />The proposed cell tower site is directly across the street and approximately 1000 <br />feet from the Parker Elementary School site which will be occupied by 350 <br />students from the Charlemagne Elementary School starting this fall. These <br />children, ages 5 to 11 years old, will be involuntarily subjected to 6 hours of daily <br />exposure to cell tower radiation for up to 6 years. As shown in the following <br />figure, Ridgeline Elementary School would be within 1500 feet of the proposed <br />tower, Spencer Butte MS would be 2200 feet away, and Edgewood Elementary <br /> <br />Fodor & Associates - Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.