the proposed tower site. T-Mobile, which is notoriously one of the weaker <br />services in Eugene, had two to three bars of signal strength. Neighbors reported <br />excellent Verizon service in the area. To verify the quality of Verizon service, a <br />colleague with Verizon service drove up and down the length of West Amazon <br />Drive on 4/21/15 and reported four to five bars of reception throughout the <br />corridor. <br /> <br />The high quality of service offered by other service providers (i.e., Verizon) <br />indicates that they have been able to provide service to this area with the existing <br />cell tower infrastructure. If AT&T needs to boost its signal in the area, it should be <br />able to co-locate with existing cell towers used by other carriers to achieve similar <br />result without adding a new cell tower. AT&T must provide evidence that the <br />existing infrastructure that other service providers, like Verizon, use to provided <br />excellent service, is not capable of being used by AT&T. <br />this evidence is the basis for denying this application. <br /> <br />AT&T Cell Phone Coverage Maps <br /> <br />AT&T cell phone coverage maps were reviewed for the area around the proposed <br />tower site at the Crossfire Church. The maps are available on the AT&T website <br />and show prospective customers where the company has coverage and what <br />level or quality of coverage is offered. These maps show full cell phone coverage <br />and full data coverage with full 4G LTE service. <br /> <br />data. The solid orange color indicates full coverage. The entire area well beyond <br />proposed cell tower location is solid orange for voice and data. The third graphic <br />shows that full 4G LTE data coverage is available from AT&T for the entire South <br />Eugene area, and beyond. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Fodor & Associates - Page 4 <br />