.~cpert Spoles•I MtlCellTowelLawyers.com <br />, 212114 10:29 PM <br />Tower. Those living near a Cell Tower are 4.15 times more likely to develop cancer. <br />c ~ <br />Authors: Ronni Wolf MD, Danny Wolf MD t <br />i fE <br />{ In addition to the German and Israeli sudies of 2004, there are literally hundreds of studies and reports <br />I which. evidence the adverse health impacts of RF emissions and EMFs. The following is a sampling of various l <br />= reports,. expert studies, abstracts, and short videos of expert presentations. - <br />P "Health Effects from Cell Phone Tower Radiation" <br />An excellent introduction, in plain english, to <br />(1) the well-established health risks associated with Cell Towers, <br />(2) how the wireless industry has manipulated the U.S. government into stripping citizen's rights to <br />challenge the installation of Cell Towers based upon health concerns, and <br />(3) how, to the delight of the wireless industry, the FCC has deemed "safe" levels of RF emissions to be <br />5,000 times higher than the levels deemed safe by other countries. <br />By Karen J. Rodgers [Read Report] <br />The United States Study 2010 - "Blological Effects from exposure to electromagnetic <br />radiation emitted by cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays" <br />i "It makes little sense to keep denying health symptoms that are being reported in good faith. Many <br />I biological effects have been documented at very low intensities comparable to what the population <br />! experiences within 200 to 500 ft of a cell tower." <br />t <br />"Effects reported include: genetic, growth, and reproductive; increases in permeability of the blood- <br />brain barrier; behavioral; molecular, cellular, and metabolic; and Increases in cancer risk." <br />! B. Blake Levitt, Henry Lai - Dept of Bioengineering, University of Washington [Read Study] <br />i <br />With the wireless industry having spent over $400 million in political contributions and lobbying in <br />i Washington, it comes as no surprise that the U.S. has done little, if anything, to research the potential <br />i adverse health impacts of RF emissions. Asa result, all emerging information regarding the adverse health <br />impacts of RF emissions is.being generated through expert studies being conducted in countries other than <br />j the U.S.: <br />b The Poland Military Study 1996 - "Cancer morbidity in subjects occupationally exposed to <br />high frequency (radiofrequency and microwave) electromagnetic radiation." <br />The Military Center for Radiation Safety studied the cancer death rates for all career military personnel <br />(approx 128,000 persons each year), for the 14 year period of 1971-1985. The study revealed that <br />persons occupationally exposed to RF emissions were nearly twice as likely to develop brain tumors, <br />13.9 times more likely to develop chronic myeocylic leukemia, 8.62 times more likely to develop acute <br />myeoblastic leukemia and 5.82 times more likely to develop non-hodgkin lymphomas. <br />Department of Biological Effect of Non-Ionizing Radiations, Center for Radloblo/ogy and Radiation Safety <br />at the Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Warsaw, Poland <br />Tne Australia Study 1996 - Cancer inidence and mortality and proximity to RF emissions from <br />TV Towers <br />18 year study of residents of 9 municipalities, from 1972-1990, revealed increased rates of childhood leukemia <br />and death for children subjected to RF emissions from N antennas. <br />Bruce Hocking, Ian Gordon, Heather L. Grain and Gifford E. Hatfield <br />ttP:/Avww.antice0towerlrwtvn.com/linh/expert-studies.htmI Pays 2 of 5 <br />