HomeMy WebLinkAboutEnvironanalysis revised RF Sound review 5-7-15REVIEW OF NON-IONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC
RADIATION EXPOSURE AND NOISE IMPACTS IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF EUGENE CODE
EC.9.5750
For Conditional Use Permit CU 14-3
Crossfire Church 4060 W. Amazon Drive Eugene, Oregon
PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF EUGENE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Prepared by Environalysis, LLC
Seattle, WA
REVISED May 2015
INTRODUCTION
The City of Eugene Department of Planning and Development asked Environalysis, LLC to
provide a review of the RF and noise emissions of a new communications facility to be located at
4060 West Amazon Drive, Eugene Oregon on land zoned as residential (R-1) and adjacent to
other R-1 zones. A new 75’ tall monopole would be constructed with associated
telecommunications equipment cabinets and a 50KW emergency power generator. A total of
twelve (12) antennas would be added to the monopole (four antennas in each of the three
sectors).
The City facilitated this review by providing the following data:
Project plans from AT & T for Conditional Use Permit number 14-3
Application Package from applicant including a NIER (non-ionizing electromagnetic
radiation) and an acoustic report.
NOISE AND RF EMISSIONS OF THE PROJECT
AT & T is proposing to construct a new 75’ tall monopole and equipment platform to be located
at 4060 West Amazon Drive. This monopole would be sited on property zoned as residential (R-
1) and borders residential (R-1) land; thus an examination of potential noise impacts is
necessary.
The new antennas would be centered at 71 feet above grade. There will be a total of twelve (12)
antennas installed on the monopole (designed to appear as a tree and known as a “monopine”).
Communications equipment cabinets will be housed in a temperature-controlled shelter. A 50
kW diesel-powered emergency generator will be installed as part of this project
PROJECT IMPACTS
The City’s maximum permissible property-line noise standard of 45 dBA applies to this site as it
adjoins residential zones. The overall sound pressure rating of the telecommunications
equipment to be installed is 72 dBA measured at a distance of 5 feet. The nearest residential
property lines are 70 feet to the west and 200 feet to the south. The resulting noise impacts are
under the City’s noise ordinance level of 45 dBA but not less than the 35 dBA agreed to by the
City for the south property line as part of the Conditional Use Permit process. The installation of
low- noise blower options on the two air conditioning units will enable compliance with the 35
dBA limit.
The emergency generator will be operated during power outages and for a monthly 10-minute
test) and will cause noise impacts greater than the City’s Ordinance. The proposed 9 foot high
noise wall and other mitigation measures (such as, insulating the emergency generator shed and
installing a highly effective exhaust stack muffler, an insulated air intake hood and air discharge
louver) will reduce them to nearly the 45 dBA standard. However, in order to reduce the
generator’s noise impacts to within the City Ordinance the Proponent’s acoustic consultants
issued a revised report (April 20, 2015) which incorporated the following changes:
Adding an insulated elbow for the air discharge that will direct the warm air discharge
from the generator room downwards towards the ground. For the best results the ground
under the elbow should not be a hard reflective surface such as asphalt or concrete; but
should be lawn or landscaping. The noise attenuation for this elbow is supported by data
from ASHRAE for the insulated elbows of the appropriate dimensions.
The noise attenuation for the GT-201-5100 critical grade exhaust muffler was increased
from 30 dBA to 35 dBA. An examination of data from GT for this model of muffler
indicates that 35 dBA is the more accurate attenuation factor.
A change was made in how noise attenuation factors were assigned for the air intake
noise that would be experienced at the nearest residential property to the west. The
“building factor” was reduced by 7 dBA and this same amount was added to the “noise
control” category. This change reflects the fact that the noise reduction from the air
intake plenum belongs more properly in the “noise control” category than in the
“building factor” category but has no effect upon the overall noise impacts.
The revised report corrected a misprint for the” Building factor” noise attenuation for air
intake impacts at the south residential property line. The figure of -10 dBA should not
have been in the table. The dBA impacts remain unchanged as the total for all noise
attenuation (Build Factor + Noise Control) does not change (it is -17 dBA in both
reports).
One error does remain in the revised “Receiving Property-South” table: The dBA impact
at the south residential property for exhaust noise should have been calculated as 31 dBA
not the 36 dBA shown in the table. However, due to the fact that noise levels add
logarithmically there will be no change in the total impact level of 45 dBA.
The emergency generator, with the additional mitigation measure of an insulated hood for the air
intake will meet the City’s 45 dBA standard.
The applicant provided calculations of RF emissions that would be received by a person at
ground level. Their calculations follow standard formulas. The RF power density calculations
performed indicate the maximum power exposure for a person standing at ground level and
indicate that the maximum power density for a person would be less than 1.3% of the FCC
standards for the general public. The results are consistent with the reported output power of the
antennas.
CONCLUSIONS
The information in the applicant’s proposal is sufficient to determine that the NIER impacts of
the project fall well within Federal and City regulatory limits. The applicant detailed noise
mitigation measures that will enable the proposal to meet the City’s noise ordinance and stricter
limits agreed to as part of the CUP process. No additional conditions need to be applied to
mitigate either the project’s sound pressure levels or its NIER emissions.