stability issues that necessitate design-specific geotechnical <br />recommendations. <br /> The report includes: all of the requirements of <br />Levels 1 and 2 above; design recommendations for structures, <br />foundations, compacted fill, cut/fill lines, earthwork, and streets; <br />mitigation measures for seismic hazards, landslides, and constraints <br />that cannot be removed; construction measures for backfill, <br />compaction, drainage, weather limitations, access across slope <br />easements; inspection requirements during and following <br />construction; and graphical representation of slope easements and <br />design details for foundations and structures. <br />Comments: <br /> <br />Hazardous Materials Review <br /> <br />Yes No <br />25. Is a Hazardous Materials Review application required? <br /> <br /> <br />Comments: <br />Street and Public Access Way Requirements <br /> <br />Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A <br />26. Identify the number of peak hour trips based on the likely development <br />that will occur on all lots resulting from the land division. If the <br /> development will generate 100 or more trips during any peak hour, a <br />Traffic Impact Analysis Review is required in accordance with 9.8650 - <br />9.8680. <br />27. Show street names for all existing and proposed streets (public and <br /> <br />private) and identify the street classification. <br />28. Indicate potential slope easements. <br /> <br />29. Delineate any street segments where grade exceeds 15% percent, where <br /> <br />driveways are prohibited. <br />30. Provide a street center profile using ground elevations of proposed streets <br /> <br />at or exceeding 15% grade. <br />31. Show location and widths (right-of-way and paving width) of all existing <br /> and proposed streets, intersections, and bike and pedestrian access ways, <br />both within the plat and adjacent to the plat. <br />32. Show existing and proposed curbs and sidewalks on site and adjacent to <br /> <br />property involved. <br />33. Address EC 9.6815 Street Connectivity and provide supporting narrative <br /> <br />or if requesting an exception, provide justifications. <br />34. Show that the proposal is consistent with Eugene Code Section 9.6780, <br /> <br />Vision Clearance Area. <br />35. Indicate radii of all street curves on the plans. <br /> <br />36. Show location and type of existing and proposed transit-related facilities. <br /> <br />37. Show existing and proposed special setbacks, in accordance with Eugene <br /> <br />Code Section 9.6750. <br />38. Submit an Alternative Traffic Safety Study (ATSS) if an adjustment is <br /> <br />requested to the required internal vehicle stacking at EC 9.6703(3)(a). <br />39. Show all existing access driveways to the property. When the property <br /> fronts a street under Lane County jurisdiction, show driveway locations <br />for adjacent properties also. <br />40. Demonstrate that access to the development site is located in accordance <br /> <br />with EC 7.420. <br />41. Submit an ATSS if requesting more than one access connection for a <br /> single development site and/or requesting that an access connection be <br />wider than 20 feet. <br />42. Include internal pedestrian circulation plan in accordance with EC <br /> <br />9.6730. <br />Please show the existing PUE over Foxboro Ln, dedicated per Spencer Park Cluster plat. <br />Comments: <br />Please address EC 9.6735(2) regarding access connection location standards. <br /> <br />Conditional Use Permit Completeness Review Form Revised 9/2010 Page 3 of 4 <br />