AT&T’s coverage propagation software systems use these and other factors (type of antenna, <br />antenna tilt, etc.) to predict the coverage that will be provided by the proposed site. <br />When this technical analysis was completed for this project, a search ring map was provided to <br />AT&T’s site development specialists. The approximate search ring boundaries for this project are: <br />th <br />E. 38Avenue to the north; <br />rd <br />E. 43 Avenue to the south; <br />University Street to the east; and <br />Dillard Road to the west. <br />See Att. 13: Search Ring. <br />Usingthis information, AT&T ranked potential sites. Whenever feasible, AT&T strives to site its <br />projects on property that is properly zoned and adjacent to compatible land uses. AT&T attempts <br />to select a location and design that minimizes negative visual impacts to the greatest extent <br />possible. Sites adjacent to existing tall power lines, antenna facilities, water treatment facilities, <br />and on the tops of buildings are selected when they meet the technical requirements of the <br />system. Rooftop and utility pole applications are favored where the design can be screened or <br />incorporated into the existing structure and mechanical equipment can be placed out of view. <br />New, freestanding towers and poles are amongthe last design options to be considered. <br />After viewing the area, the locationsconsidered included various light poles and utility poles <br />surrounding the Fox Hollow area and Amazon Drive area, in addition topotential new build sites. <br />Sites were eliminated from consideration due to zoning ordinances prohibitingthe location, <br />insufficient room for mechanical equipment, required setbacks that could not be achieved,or <br />property where a lease could not be acquired. A table outlining the analyses of alternative sites <br />considered is below (in the response to application submittal requirement EC 9.5750(6)(c)2). <br />Three coverage maps are attached as Exhibits to Attachment 11: RF Coverage Maps. Exhibit 1A <br />demonstrates the existing level of service. Exhibit 1B demonstrates the service that will be <br />provided by the new location at a height of 75 feet (antenna tip height). Exhibit 1C demonstrates <br />the service that would be provided from an alternative sitean existing light standard. <br />The areas shaded in green on the maps indicate where an AT&T wireless device can be reliably <br />used to make and receive telephone calls. The terrain, foliage, nearby structures, <br />and telecommunication facility location are taken into account. The further the distance from <br />the facility, or the more abundant the clutter (trees, buildings, etc.) between the facility and the <br />wireless device, the weaker the signal will be. <br />Other factors, not represented on the RF Coverage Maps, include the ability of the site to handle <br />the required call capacity and to provide the extent of data and other services required by AT&T <br />customers. The proposed site is designed to provide coverage consistent with these factors. <br />AT&T’s RF engineers have determined that at the proposed location, a 70-foot antenna tip height <br />Site ID: EG46 Fox Hollow & Amazon RoadPage 4of 22 <br />