PH-1 Pre-Hearing Exhibit #1 <br />approval criteria are at EC 9.8030. The WG permit approval criteria are at EC 9.8815. <br /> <br />Public Notice Public notice of the applications was mailed and posted on August 27, 2013, consistent <br />with the requirements of EC 9.7315 Public Hearing Notice. As of the date of this staff report, written <br />public testimony has been received from the following individuals and forwarded to the Hearings <br />Official for consideration: <br /> <br /> In Favor: David Adee Avis Eileen Adee <br /> Patricia Holtz David Campbell <br /> Martin Henner Jerry Carniglia <br /> Mark Goehring and Julie Hunn Sheila Stein <br /> Charles Chisholm Nora Davis <br /> Pat Bryan Steve Goldman <br /> Antonia Lewis Sand <br /> Otto Poticha Susan Hyne <br /> Dennis Clark Clare Strawn <br /> Carleen Reilly Don Kahle <br /> Jodi Sommers Patricia Parcells <br /> Shane MacRhodes Mike van Mantgem <br /> Marshall Wilde <br /> <br /> Opposed: Anne Love Phyllis Temple <br /> Paul and Cecelia Heintz Dean Nussbaum <br /> Judy Scott Rich Dambrov <br /> Rachel Stedman Bryn Thoms <br /> Maj Hutchinson Planet Glassberg <br /> Nena Lovinger Charlotte Maloney <br /> Dale Greenlee David Cutting <br /> Sarah Adkison <br /> Don McLean and Elizabeth Marshall <br /> Jean Darian, Laurie Trautman, and Simon Trautman <br /> <br />In response to comments opposed to the development, staff has evaluated the items of concern in the <br />following evaluation. The adequacy of the transportation system is evaluated in the following staff <br />report at approval criterion EC 9.8320(5). Density is addressed at EC 9.8320(11)(a). Floodplain <br />development is addressed at EC 9.8320(11)(c). Natural resource impacts are addressed at EC <br />9.8320(4). Impacts to the Willamette River are evaluated in the concurrent Willamette Greenway <br />permit application, under the approval criteria beginning at EC 9.8815, which follows the PUD <br />evaluation, toward the end of this report. Emergency response is addressed at EC 9.8320(6). Water <br />service is conditioned at EC 9.8320(11)(b). The adequacy of public facilities and services is evaluated at <br />EC 9.8320(7). Stormwater runoff is addressed at EC 9.8320(11)(j). Visual impacts, building location, <br />solar access, screening, and compatibility are evaluated at EC 9.8320(3), EC 9.8320(11)(k), and EC <br />9.8320(13). In response to testimony about public notice, staff confirms that signs were posted <br />consistent with code requirements. When staff learned that some signs were no longer in place, staff <br />reposted the area (although not required by code) and added an additional large sign at the end of <br />McClure Lane (in excess of code requirements). <br /> <br />Staff Report: Oakleigh Meadows Cohousing September 2013 Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />