My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Pre-hearing Exhibits
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
Pre-hearing Exhibits
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:36 PM
Creation date
1/31/2014 12:58:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
1/31/2014
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PH45ZĞĐ͛Ě9/9/13 <br />MynameisRichDambrovandIhaveownedmyhomeat119OakleighLaneforover8years.Iwould <br />liketovoicemyconcernstotheOakleighMeadowCoHousing(OMC)developmentascurrently <br />proposed. <br />Theoriginalscopeoftheprojectwasmuchsmallerthanthecurrentproposals.ThoughIwasnot <br />excitedaboutanewdevelopmentonourquiet,deadendstreet,Iwasattractedtoandinterestedinthe <br />cohousingidea.Ihadacceptedthatlandownerscoulddevelopthe͞ŵĞĂĚŽǁ͟somedayandfeltthat <br />theoriginalplanforamuchsmallercohousingdevelopmentwouldbeabettercasescenario.When <br />theprojectscopeandsizebegantoincrease,Ibecamemuchmoreconcerned. <br />Ifeelthatthisscaleofaprojectwillhaveahugeimpactonthelocalneighborhood.Weare <br />characterizedasaquietdeadendstreetthatreceiveslittletraffic.Adevelopmentsuchasthiswilllikely <br />causetrafficto,attheveryleast,double.Thefactthattheamountofunitsexceedsthecurrentnumber <br />ofhousesonOakleighLanebringsinsafetyconcernsandraisesthequestionastopotentialfurther <br />developmentstocompensate(suchaswideningthestreet,sidewalks,andlighting)forit.Afterwe <br />heardoftheincreaseofunits,mywifecontactedOMCabouttheseconcernsandwastoldthattheydid <br />nothaveanswersandthattheseweredecisionsthatthecitywouldneedtomake.TheOMCapplication <br />suggeststhattheresidentswilltakeadvantageofpublictransitandbicyclepaths,butĐĂŶ͛ƚrelyonthese <br />suggestionswhenplanningforpotentialtrafficincreases.Personally,Icommutebybicycleregularly, <br />howeverI,astheresidentsofOMCamnotboundtothischoiceandcanchoosetocommutebycaras <br />neededordesired. <br />Werecentlyreceivedamailingfromthecitydetailingtheprojectandprovidingthepublicwithan <br />opportunitytovoiceourconcerns.I,asmanyofmyneighbors,feelthatthisisanimportantissuethat <br />willnotjustaffectus.ItwillbecomeafurtherprecedentforhowlandintheRiverRoadcommunityis <br />usedanddeveloped.Idonotopposedevelopment;however,weneedtolimittheimpactthat <br />developmentshaveoncurrentlivability.IalsodonotopposethepeoplewhoareaffiliatedwithOMC.I <br />considerthoseaffiliatedwhoarecurrentlyneighborstobefriendsandotherswhomImetseemtobe <br />goodpeople.Theissue,rather,involveslanduse.AscaledbackOakleighMeadowCoHousingProject <br />couldperhapsprovideanexamplefordevelopmentthatcancoexistwith,andperhapsenhance,our <br />ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚ͛Ɛuniquequalities. <br />Pleaseconsiderreevaluatingthisprojectinlightofthelargeimpactthatit,ascurrentlyproposed,will <br />haveonourcommunity. <br />Thankyou, <br />RichDambrov <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.