My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Pre-hearing Exhibits
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
Pre-hearing Exhibits
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:36 PM
Creation date
1/31/2014 12:58:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
1/31/2014
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PH-1 Pre-Hearing Exhibit #1 <br />trunks. <br /> <br />topographical survey, which confirms that most of the trees are fruit and filbert trees that are less <br />than eight-inches in diameter. Most of those trees are proposed for removal. The larger fruit trees <br />along the southeast property line are proposed for preservation, which complies with the above <br />approval criterion as these trees provide screening and buffering functions. The applicant also <br />proposes to preserve a group of ash trees, west of Building 7, and a cluster of young cedar trees <br />between Buildings 3 and 4. Preservation of these trees complies with the above criterion because they <br />are stands of trees, rather than isolated individuals. The most significant tree being preserved on the <br />subject property is a 14-inch fir <br />delineate the critical root zone (CRZ) of the tree to show that it can survive construction impacts, <br />which are primarily the surrounding vehicle use areas, rather than buildings. <br /> <br />The <br />that the proposed parking garages and concrete wall will not require their removal. As discussed <br />previously at EC 9.8320(3), the applicant has not delineated the CRZ for the row of cedars abutting the <br />north property line. Under the screening criterion at EC 9.8320(3), staff recommended a condition for <br />the final PUD plans to show the CRZ of the row of cedars abutting the north property line, with either <br />supporting documentation from a certified arborist that the trees could survive construction impacts <br />or moving Building 2 farther to the south, outside the CRZ. Based on the condition established at EC <br />9.8320(3), which is incorporated by reference, approval criterion EC 9.8320(4) is also satisfied. <br /> <br />(c) Restoration or Replacement. <br />1. <br />proposal mitigates, to the greatest degree attainable or feasible, the loss of <br />significant natural features described in criteria (a) and (b) above, through the <br />restoration or replacement of natural features such as: <br />a. Planting of replacement trees within common areas; or <br />b. Re-vegetation of slopes, ridgelines, and stream corridors; or <br />c. Restoration of fish and wildlife habitat, native plant habitat, wetland <br />areas, and riparian vegetation. <br />To the extent applicable, restoration or replacement shall be in compliance <br />with the planting and replacement standards of EC 6.320. <br /> <br /> <br />The area is not acknowledged Goal 5 inventory. The applicant proposes to <br />mitigate the removal of four trees by planting approximately 26 new trees within the common areas. <br />Based on these findings, this criterion is met. <br /> <br />(d)Street Trees. If the proposal includes removal of any street tree(s), removal of those <br />street tree(s) has been approved, or approved with conditions according to the <br />process at EC 6.305. <br /> <br />No street trees are proposed for removal. <br /> <br /> <br />Staff Report: Oakleigh Meadows Cohousing September 2013 Page 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.